{"id":14934,"date":"2020-10-05T20:30:28","date_gmt":"2020-10-05T15:00:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cigniti.com\/blog\/?p=14934"},"modified":"2020-10-05T20:51:18","modified_gmt":"2020-10-05T15:21:18","slug":"software-quality-assurance-tcoe-standardization","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cigniti.com\/blog\/software-quality-assurance-tcoe-standardization\/","title":{"rendered":"Why should you standardize your Quality Assurance process"},"content":{"rendered":"

They say quality is everyone\u2019s responsibility.<\/p>\n

But what if everyone fulfills this responsibility in their own way, without following any pre-determined guidelines, industry best practices, or protocols?<\/p>\n

Due to such an individualized approach, the outcomes of the Quality Assurance process will not be aligned to the overall organization\u2019s objectives and goals.<\/p>\n

As each team or unit would use their choice of tools, platforms, and reporting mechanisms, there will be a lack of a standard way in which the QA outcomes can be measured and evaluated. And, a non-standard approach toward QA across an organization becomes an expensive affair.<\/p>\n

If we look at the common software development methodologies, from Waterfall to Agile to DevOps, there is still little importance given to the QA function. Especially with waterfall and Agile SDLCs, QA would come at the end of the development process.<\/p>\n

Having QA at the end, that too in a non-standardized way, results in two things \u2013<\/p>\n