{"id":14159,"date":"2019-09-03T19:19:50","date_gmt":"2019-09-03T13:49:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cigniti.com\/blog\/?p=14159"},"modified":"2019-09-04T11:40:30","modified_gmt":"2019-09-04T06:10:30","slug":"testing-microservices-architecture-strategy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cigniti.com\/blog\/testing-microservices-architecture-strategy\/","title":{"rendered":"This Is How Microservices Testing Can Help You Manage Chaos"},"content":{"rendered":"

Microservices have been in vogue since the term was first coined back in 2011. Microservices architecture is alleviating businesses worldwide from their woes and worries of managing massive software applications. These monolithic applications were highly restrictive in terms of scalability, technology stack and framework, and maintenance. A minor change in one part required the whole application to undergo deployment. Redeploying an entire application for a slight change is both cumbersome as well as expensive. As a result, more and more organizations are breaking down their monolith software architecture into smaller, manageable microservices. So much so that experts predict microservices to become the default architectural style in the coming years.<\/p>\n

As defined by Martin Fowler, \u201cThe Microservices architectural style is an approach to developing a single application as a suit of small services, each running in its own process and communicating with lightweight mechanisms, often an HTTP resource API. These services are built around business capabilities and independently deployable by fully automated deployment machinery. There is a bare minimum of centralized management of these services, which may be written in different programming languages and use different data storage technologies.\u201d<\/p>\n

In a microservices architecture, services are loosely coupled and cohesive. Each unit has the liberty to choose its own programming language and technology stack for the sake of the feature or product it is developing. All of these individual units using different programming languages and framework also have their own, independent runtime.<\/p>\n

While the benefits of a microservices architecture are vast, the challenges are no less. The biggest challenge is aggregation of all the individual products or services and their integration with one another. As Sam Newman points out, \u201cGetting integration right is the single most important aspect of the technology associated with microservices in my opinion. Do it well, and your microservices retain their autonomy, allowing you to change and release them independent of the whole. Get it wrong, and disaster awaits.\u201d<\/p>\n

For such a diverse architecture, testing on a common framework is not feasible. The several moving parts and ephemerals within such an architecture create monitoring difficulties, consequently leading to increased complexities and overhead expenses. If monolith applications presented the setback of snail pace and heavy protocols, microservices present the quandary of communication gaps and uncoordinated movement.<\/p>\n

When we talk about testing microservices, the strategy should involve both technical as well as business standpoint to be successful. Let us discuss how microservices testing can help mitigate chaos that might ensue due to communication latency, expensive tracing, and high infrastructural complexities:<\/p>\n

Take a multi-tier testing approach<\/strong><\/p>\n

Given the numerous ephemerals within a microservices architecture, it is not practical, or even possible, to test all of them on a common framework. The single test framework<\/a> that was used for the monolith applications does not stand valid for the individual, smaller service units. This is because, the single-tiered monoliths run as a single process in the production environment. On the other hand, each microservice has its own individual run time, thus, demanding a break-down of the testing framework as well.<\/p>\n

Initially, it was believed that a microservices architecture will significantly reduce the need for regression testing. However, testing at every stage, after each code change, is still very critical. It has just become less tedious and more manageable with microservices. Taking a multi-tiered approach in testing, as against the single-tier test strategy, yields better and more efficient test results:<\/p>\n