In simpler, internet-less times, looting banks required physical presence of masked, gun-bearing robbers. If banks were proactive enough, they could take down the robbers and prevent the loot with tight security force or hamper an ongoing robbery by calling in additional help.<\/p>\n
Nowadays, with internet practically ruling our lives, robbing a bank has become easier while securing it has become a real headache. Amidst the millions of interconnected IoT devices, identifying the weak nodes has emerged as one of the biggest challenges. Without knowing what to secure, how will the security strategy work?<\/p>\n
Security, in every possible aspect, always remains a pressing concern, requiring immediate, unwavering addressal from the designated authorities. Despite several occurrences of security breaches, IoT devices do not enjoy the much-deserved attention from their manufacturers. Looking at this laid-back attitude, now the governments across the globe are taking over the reins of IoT security.<\/p>\n
The bipartisan U.S. senate and house members recently reintroduced an IoT security focused bill to pass \u201cIoT Cybersecurity Improvement Act of 2019<\/a><\/u><\/strong>\u201d. This Act is supposed to take care of the insecurities affecting IoT devices worldwide. The Japanese government is taking preemptive measures to fortify IoT devices ahead of the Olympics games to be held next year. It will take the help of White-hat hackers to attempt to penetrate over 200 million devices to discover insecure devices. With the direct involvement of regulatory bodies, IoT manufacturers will, apprehensively or willingly, divert their eyes as well as budgets to the security frameworks.<\/p>\n
Why the Delay in Addressal?<\/strong><\/p>\n
Why IoT Devices Face Security Issues?<\/strong><\/p>\n
The California IoT Cybersecurity law<\/strong><\/a> has mandated incorporation of \u2018reasonable\u2019 security features in any device that connects to the internet, directly or indirectly. Taking care of insufficient authentication systems in most IoT devices, the law has been signed to ensure prevention of unauthorized access and compromise of sensitive information. The shift to cloud and web-based interface has also opened new opportunities for hackers to infiltrate the device. Most IoT devices employ insecure network services, inadequate security configurability and unprotected firmware.<\/p>\n
What should be the action plan for ensuring IoT safety?<\/strong><\/p>\n
4 ways Application Security Testing can fight IoT insecurities<\/strong><\/p>\n
To Conclude<\/strong><\/p>\n
Securing an IoT network is anything but easy and cheap. It requires delegation of a disciplined action plan to protect and monitor billions of interconnected devices. Impregnation of a single device may cause compromise of other connected nodes as well. It is imperative that critical personal information assets are identified and isolated from the network in order to prevent serious damage in case of a breach. Measures such as two-factor authentication, setting unique passwords, and installation of firewalls have become a necessity. While application security testing enables a proactive approach to IoT threats, taking these steps grants additional protection.<\/p>\n
Cigniti possesses rich expertise in\u00a0Security Testing\u00a0of enterprise applications<\/a>, catering to diversified business needs and serving clients across different industry verticals and organization sizes. Our Web application security testing uncovers vulnerabilities in applications and ensures the application risks are minimized.<\/p>\n
Connect with us<\/a>\u00a0to leverage a dedicated Security Testing Center of Excellence (TCoE)<\/a> that has developed methodologies, processes, templates, checklists, and guidelines for web applications, software products, networks, and cloud.<\/p>\n